1 |
On Monday, October 17, 2016 07:48:29 PM Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku wrote: |
2 |
> So far after much digging on the TV I haven't found a way to actually get it |
3 |
> to do what I want. I'm not sure if it even can. I will look when I next |
4 |
> get access to the system (currently in use by other members of the |
5 |
> household). Perhaps somewhere we have a manual for it? I really don't |
6 |
> know. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I agree, that it would be preferable to not have to make the computer fudge |
9 |
> it, but if after having spent time trying to fix it on the TV itself |
10 |
> multiple times, only to find that all options I have found, end up |
11 |
> producing very undesirable results (such as displaying it a 4:3 aspect |
12 |
> ratio, or a 2:1 aspect ratio). I'll see if I can find what I need. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I do know that if I could get the TV to change the setting for that so it |
15 |
> doesn't end up overscanning, without doing other "weird" stuff, it would |
16 |
> mean that I could see the full boot process, not missing bits of it off the |
17 |
> edge of the screen. |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
Once upon a time, in the days of analog displays, we used modelines to |
21 |
accomplish what you're doing. |
22 |
|
23 |
I don't think modelines work with pure-digital outputs, though. Does your TV |
24 |
have a VGA input, and does your box have a VGA output? That would be an |
25 |
effective, if not ideal, solution. |
26 |
|
27 |
Alternately, have you tried setting your display to an unusual resolution? |
28 |
What's the output of the xrandr command? It should give you a list of |
29 |
supported resolutions refresh rates, including flags to tell you which ones are |
30 |
selected and which ones are recommended. Often, with digital TVs, there will |
31 |
be a resolution you can use that evades the TV's overscan emulation. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
:wq |