Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: perl blockers (was: Re: [gentoo-user] can emerging git really require 121 pkgs?)
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:02:52
Message-Id: 201412150002.42774.dilfridge@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] can emerging git really require 121 pkgs? by Harry Putnam
1 Am Sonntag, 14. Dezember 2014, 22:54:12 schrieb Harry Putnam:
2 > ------- ------- ---=--- ------- -------
3 > emerge -vp dev-vcs/git
4 > (To avoid clogging the group with all that text... its posted here:
5 >
6 > zeus.jtan.com/~reader/vu2/disp.cgi
7
8 I'm curious about your portage output, mind telling me 1) your exact portage
9 version, 2) and if you have anything in package.(accept_)keywords related to
10 virtual/perl*, dev-lang/perl, or perl-core/* ?!
11
12 background:
13
14 [ebuild N ] virtual/perl-File-Spec-3.480.0 0 kB
15
16 should never be pulled in on a stable system (but portage does not mark it
17 with a ~ as unstable, weird...
18
19 =dev-lang/perl-5.20.1* required by (virtual/perl-File-
20 Spec-3.480.0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
21
22 is then just a consequence of above oddity...
23
24 TIA, Andreas
25
26 --
27
28 Andreas K. Huettel
29 Gentoo Linux developer
30 dilfridge@g.o
31 http://www.akhuettel.de/

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: perl blockers Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>