1 |
... |
2 |
>> >>> I still think it's a driver problem. Again: it's *physically* |
3 |
>> >>> impossible to |
4 |
>> >>> have these problems with the HDMI signal. At most you get "digital |
5 |
>> >>> noise", |
6 |
>> >>> which means some pixels get stuck or are missing. But not what you |
7 |
>> >>> get; that's just something that can't be explained. |
8 |
>> >> |
9 |
>> >> I was thinking about this. The digital HDMI signal must be converted |
10 |
>> >> into an analog signal at some point if it's being represented as light |
11 |
>> >> on a TV screen. Electrical interference generated by the computer and |
12 |
>> >> traveling up the HDMI wire should have its chance to affect things |
13 |
>> >> (i.e. create weird shadows) at that point, right? |
14 |
>> > |
15 |
>> > Not with DFPs. Those work digital even internally. I assume of course |
16 |
>> > that his HDMI TV *is* a DFP. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> But at some point the 1s and 0s must be converted to some sort of an |
19 |
>> analog signal if only right behind the diode. A diode must be |
20 |
>> presented with a signal in some sort of analog form in order to |
21 |
>> illuminate, right? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> no. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> If your tv is a standard flat panel, the sub pixels only go from on to off and |
26 |
> back. Nothing else. There is no analog signal, no transformation nothing. And |
27 |
> off means 'let light through' and on 'black' |
28 |
|
29 |
Every digital signal is encoded into an analog signal. I think it |
30 |
would take some serious EMI to sufficiently change the characteristics |
31 |
of an analog signal so as to create an error in the overlying digital |
32 |
signal if that signal is traveling along a wire. I can imagine it |
33 |
happens but I would think it's rare. Even if that signal were |
34 |
altered, I would think it just about impossible that anything but an |
35 |
error could be produced. |
36 |
|
37 |
Whether an LED is on or off is determined by whether or not it is |
38 |
forward biased. Biasing is established by analog voltages and/or |
39 |
currents, and those can be altered by EMI. Again, I would think it's |
40 |
very rare that EMI could affect an LED's forward biasing and change |
41 |
its state from on to off or off to on. |
42 |
|
43 |
However, what color an LED emits is determined by the energy gap of |
44 |
the semiconductor which is very much an analog process. How could it |
45 |
be anything else? How do you tell a photon to emit a certain color by |
46 |
feeding it 1's and 0's? There has to be at least one D/A conversion |
47 |
somewhere between the digital signal and the emittance of the LED, and |
48 |
that is the most likely point for EMI to affect the final output. |
49 |
|
50 |
> If you have an led display it is pretty much the same. All the levels you see |
51 |
> are achieved with fast switching. There are no analog levels. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Stroller is probably correct with overscan/underscan. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> But that has nothing to do with digital/analog conversion. |
56 |
> |
57 |
> |
58 |
>> Digital is just a figment of our imagination after |
59 |
>> all. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> emm, no, seriously not. |
62 |
|
63 |
It is though. It only exists in the conceptual world, not the |
64 |
physical world. If you want to do anything with your digital signal |
65 |
besides change it, store it, or transfer it, there must be a D/A |
66 |
conversion. |
67 |
|
68 |
- Grant |