Archives
Archives
| From: | "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:22:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200610171516.02085.bo.andresen@zlin.dk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update? by Neil Bothwick |
||
| 1 | On Sunday 15 October 2006 14:27, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 | > As I've mentioned several times before, there was a patch to |
| 3 | > dispatch-conf to do just this. You added the files you didn't want |
| 4 | > touching, ever, to a line in the config file. Unfortunately, the patch |
| 5 | > hasn't been updated for a couple of years and stopped working a while |
| 6 | > ago. Why not re-open the bug at |
| 7 | > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68618 |
| 8 | |
| 9 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151685 |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Bo Andresen |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update? | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |