| 1 |
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 23:29:39 +0000, Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > > Why do wikis and the like suggest that iptables should be in default |
| 4 |
> > > rather than boot runlevel? |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Why not? There's no need to start it especially early, as long as it |
| 7 |
> > is running before the network comes up, and the init script takes |
| 8 |
> > care of that. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I haven't seen anything in net.lo that waits for iptables and I seem to |
| 11 |
> recall that the network interfaces are started before iptables is run, |
| 12 |
> unless I start iptables at boot level. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The iptables init script contains "before net". |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Advanced: (adj.) doesn't work yet, but it's pretty close. See: bug, |
| 21 |
glitch. |
Archives