Archives
Archives
| From: | Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Portage autounmask is strange again | ||
| Date: | Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:36:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEH5T2PdSQNReU8EeWX-+2L9Rx5L+YAPNrpm2GbhYmCJr1KRHw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Portage autounmask is strange again by "Sebastian Beßler" |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Sebastian Beßler |
| 2 | <sebastian@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 | > Why is autounmask trying to unmask ExtUtils-ParseXS if it's not needed? |
| 4 | > Should I report this as a bug? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | I think it's only telling you what you should unmask. Setting |
| 7 | --autounmask=n simply makes it stop giving you this hint. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | To actually unmask anything you would need to use --autounmask-write=y |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Use --tree to get a better idea what package wants the newer ExtUtils-ParseXS |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Portage autounmask is strange again | "Sebastian Beßler" <sebastian@××××××××××××.de> |