1 |
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017, Raffaele Belardi <raffaele.belardi@××.com> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
> I suppose it's due to Google's choice to support only Chrome, although I |
4 |
missed the Gentoo |
5 |
> news bit if there was one. |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
I'm not sure that is right, see here: https://www.google.com/earth/ |
9 |
download/gep/agree.html. |
10 |
|
11 |
It looks like it is still "supported," but development may have slowed. |
12 |
|
13 |
> For Android there is the really good Open Street Map application, are |
14 |
there any desktop |
15 |
> alternatives in Portage for non-Chrome users? I know OSM has a web |
16 |
interface but I'd |
17 |
> prefer a standalone application. |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
Take a look at QGIS.[1] There is also NASA's WorldWind.[2] GIS is the |
21 |
keyword you should be using. It looks like the competitive non-Google Earth |
22 |
software projects are mainly targeted at developers. However, it most |
23 |
places I see that still talk about Google Earth tend to use it in a |
24 |
"developer" role (typically importing GIS data, not software development). |
25 |
|
26 |
The best forum topic I could find[3] states (as does the previously |
27 |
referenced bug) Google Earth was removed to sporadic crashes. This may not |
28 |
have been fixed. Regardless, I would invite you to not be afraid of |
29 |
installing packages into your $HOME, e.g. $HOME/.local or another non-root |
30 |
location. This is typically the first step before creating an ebuild. |
31 |
|
32 |
Some users seem to install Google Earth with overlays. Overlays should be |
33 |
evaluated with respect to their maintainers, but in general I have only |
34 |
seen them cause problems as they will invariably fall out of date. For |
35 |
sufficiently popular software packages this might not be an issue. |
36 |
|
37 |
Cheers, |
38 |
R0b0t1 |
39 |
|
40 |
[1]: http://www.qgis.org/en/site/ |
41 |
[2]: https://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/ |
42 |
[3]: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-980876.html) |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
P.S.: If you can find the time, please tell whomever is responsible that |
46 |
the STM32 HAL libraries look like they were designed by poorly supervised |
47 |
interns. |