Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 2.0 and gentoo
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:25:31
Message-Id: 8cd1ed20701130818w7b6c0955l7132830f2f1f4dd@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Firefox 2.0 and gentoo by Roberto Martinez
1 On 1/12/07, Roberto Martinez <mrrobinhood5@××××××.com> wrote:
2 > Well, I've done research and found nothing, except that it happens only on
3 > gentoo ...
4 >
5 > It appears that any mozilla product segfaults on my gentoo box both binary
6 > and from source. Firefox, Thunderbird, and Seamonkey.
7 >
8 > At first i thought it was mozilla-launcher :
9 >
10 > > /usr/libexec/mozilla-launcher: line 117: 6048 Segmentation fault
11 > > "$mozbin" "$@"
12 >
13 > but when I ran the binary directly :
14 >
15 > > Segmentation fault
16 >
17 > I have reemerged gtk+ and no luck.
18 >
19 > Anything else I would need to try ? Any help is greatly appreciated.
20
21 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128221
22
23 I've not had it lately, but its been a known bug. Nobody seems to know
24 what exactly causes it. I know from experience tho, -ffast-math is bad
25 bad bad when playing with firefox, ie: firefox-bin + hand-compiled
26 plugin ( ie: mplayerplug-in) using -ffast-math , might = unstability.
27
28 Post CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/LDFLAGS, GCC versions, Firefox/mozilla versions &
29 launcher versions please.
30
31
32 --
33 /<ent Fredric
34 (aka theJackal)
35 --
36 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 2.0 and gentoo Roberto Martinez <mrrobinhood5@××××××.com>