| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 17:38 +0100, Meino Christian Cramer wrote: |
| 3 |
> From: Daniel da Veiga <danieldaveiga@×××××.com> |
| 4 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] First Mail to this list: Different isos ? |
| 5 |
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:47:38 -0200 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On 2/10/06, Meino Christian Cramer <Meino.Cramer@×××.de> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > Hello, |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > this is my frist mail to this list. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > I am on the way to install Gentoo-Linux onto my HD...but I don't |
| 13 |
> > > know what iso image to use. My platform is x86-based, therefore |
| 14 |
> > > I will use one of the *x86*.iso images. |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > > But there is a *2005.1*iso and a *2005.1-ri*iso. Right from the name, |
| 17 |
> > > I would choose the *r1* image. But it is very much smaller then the |
| 18 |
> > > other one. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Why not simply use the "current" link? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I would have done this already...if the image size would have been |
| 23 |
> more similiar... |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
The latest installer ISO's are smaller (IMHO) because they contain only |
| 26 |
stage3 tarballs (no stage-1 & 2 anymore). Haven't checked though. |
| 27 |
> > I don't know exactly why it is smaller, but you should have no |
| 28 |
> > problems with it... As the team said, its just a media refresh with a |
| 29 |
> > few bug fixes. |
| 30 |
> > |
| 31 |
> > > |
| 32 |
> > > So...is this *r1* image an update, a fix, another kind of Gentoo...? |
| 33 |
> > |
| 34 |
> > A quick google search returned: |
| 35 |
> > http://www.gentoo.org/news/20051121-release-2005.1-r1.xml |
| 36 |
...SKIP... |
| 37 |
> > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 38 |
> > |
| 39 |
HTH.Rumen |
Archives