Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] another openoffice build failure
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:06:48
Message-Id: yu9irk3uwck.fsf@nyu.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] another openoffice build failure by Richard Fish
1 At Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:16:05 -0700 Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote:
2
3 > On 9/2/06, Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu> wrote:
4 >> I am not sure what to try next. I suppose I could try to revert back
5 >> to gcc3.4.6
6 >> ajglap hdc10 # gcc-config --list-profiles
7 >> [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6
8 >> [2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardened
9 >> [3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopie
10 >> [4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopiessp
11 >> [5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednossp
12 >> [6] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1 *
13 >> ajglap hdc10 #
14 >>
15 >> Any ideas would be welcome
16 >
17 > Well googling wasn't terribly helpful for me, and I couldn't find any
18 > bug report on bugs.gentoo.org.
19
20 Same here
21
22 > The program that is failing ("ar") comes from binutils. Maybe you can
23 > try the 2.17 version of binutils...it's what I built OOo with.
24 > echo "~sys-devel/binutils-2.17 ~x86 >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
25 > emerge --oneshot binutils
26 > binutils-config -l # make sure it shows 2.17 as selected
27 > emerge --oneshot openoffice
28
29 I just tried this and the same error
30
31 > If this doesn't work, reverting gcc versions,
32
33 Same story
34
35 > or maybe even just merge openoffice-bin.
36
37 Well my openoffice emerged before the emerge world that accompanied
38 the gcc upgrade still works fine so I will continue to use that. But
39 I am disquieted by no longer being able to emerge openoffice. Clearly
40 something is wrong somewhere. I guess I will stop pursuing it
41 actively and wait for some more symptoms.
42
43 Thanks for all your efforts.
44 allan
45
46 --
47 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list