| 1 |
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:25:03 -0700 |
| 2 |
"Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 8/23/06, michael higgins <linux@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
[ 8< ] |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Considering that you just recompiled your system with a gcc version |
| 9 |
> that the gentoo devs consider to be broken for your arch....yes, yes, |
| 10 |
> and yes. :-( |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Now that sounds rather doomsday-ish, it probably really just means |
| 13 |
> there are a lot of things in the tree that will not build with it, and |
| 14 |
> not that it produces broken binaries. But it is better to be safe on |
| 15 |
> this one. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thanks, Richard. It seems that some packages (mostly sound synths and the like) aren't yet ready to compile under 4.1.1, but it was a bit better than my first attempt with keyword ~*. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Thanks again. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
|\ /| | | ~ ~ |
| 24 |
| \/ | |---| `|` ? |
| 25 |
| |ichael | |iggins \^ / |
| 26 |
michael.higgins[at]evolone[dot]org |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives