| 1 |
On Tuesday, 9 April 2019 14:34:19 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 11:11:42 AM CEST Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tuesday, 9 April 2019 06:56:02 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > if you search for "stat" in the build-log and/or makefile(s), does it |
| 5 |
> > > show |
| 6 |
> > > which file(s) it is checking? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Looking into the work directory I find this little surprise: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > # ls -l |
| 11 |
> > /var/tmp/portage/sys-boot/systemd-boot-241/work/systemd-boot-241-build |
| 12 |
> > [...] |
| 13 |
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 portage portage 22 Apr 9 09:26 libnss_myhostname.so -> |
| 14 |
> > libnss_myhostname.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 portage portage 22 Apr 9 09:26 |
| 15 |
> > libnss_mymachines.so -> libnss_mymachines.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 portage |
| 16 |
> > portage 19 Apr 9 09:26 libnss_resolve.so -> libnss_resolve.so.2 |
| 17 |
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 portage portage 19 Apr 9 09:26 libnss_systemd.so -> |
| 18 |
> > libnss_systemd.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 portage portage 15 Apr 9 09:26 |
| 19 |
> > libsystemd.so -> libsystemd.so.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 portage portage 20 Apr 9 |
| 20 |
> > 09:26 libsystemd.so.0 -> libsystemd.so.0.25.0 [...] |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > Konsole shows all these in red, indicating nonexistence of the links' |
| 23 |
> > targets, and indeed they don't exist, either there or anywhere else in the |
| 24 |
> > system. On the other hand, after ebuild ... compile on the main system, |
| 25 |
> > which succeeds, I get the same nonexistent links. So that can't be the |
| 26 |
> > problem. |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> > "find . -name Makefile -exec grep '-lw' 'stat' {} +" returns a blank. |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > I'm close to getting out of my depth here. |
| 31 |
> > |
| 32 |
> > (This is an openrc box.) |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> I just tested the compile on my system and I get the exact same error. |
| 35 |
> This is on my primary desktop, so would expect most build-dependencies to be |
| 36 |
> present. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> I also noticed the following bug on b.g.o.: |
| 39 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/682908 |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Ah. That must have been posted after I looked. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
> For your current issue, you could try version 239, which does compile on my |
| 44 |
> system. I am not going to test installing it as that risks not being able to |
| 45 |
> boot my desktop. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
Yes, 239 is fine here too. I'll leave the boxes that can compile 241 alone for |
| 48 |
the time being. |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
Thanks for your help. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-- |
| 53 |
Regards, |
| 54 |
Peter. |
Archives