| 1 |
Yesterday I hit samba bug id 11538 at a customer. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11538 |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
We still run stable samba-3.6.25 on gentoo there, with a basic NT4-style |
| 6 |
domain. Simple use case, just users/passwords, no logon scripts, no |
| 7 |
server based profiles ... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Now I consider upgrading to samba-4.2.9 (~amd64) to maybe get around |
| 10 |
that bug and in general improve support and compatibility with more |
| 11 |
recent versions of MS Windows (first w10 clients coming up ...). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Does anyone in here has done that, how clever is it to stay with |
| 14 |
NT4-domain in combo with samba-4.x ? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I just want to keep the steps small, I understand that an AD-based |
| 17 |
domain will be the way sooner or later. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Any stability or performance issues with samba-4.2.9 in gentoo? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Thanks for any feedback on this, Stefan |
Archives