1 |
>> It's time to switch hosts. I'm looking at the following: |
2 |
>> |
3 |
>> Dual Xeon E5-2690 |
4 |
>> 32GB RAM |
5 |
>> 4x SSD RAID10 |
6 |
> nice |
7 |
>> Can I count on this system to keep running if I lose an SSD? |
8 |
> if a built in raid controller, yes. one thing you might want to check is |
9 |
> linux tools for management -- you wouldn't want to reboot just go to go |
10 |
> into the raid tools and check if it requires a rebuild, and you want to |
11 |
> be able to schedule regular scrubs and maybe get a report. |
12 |
> you might also like to consider OOB management such as IPMI, dell and HP |
13 |
> do very lovely web based control panels that are independent of your |
14 |
> main o/s allowing you to get alerts when bad things happen, and |
15 |
> crucially watch reboot process from remote locations. |
16 |
|
17 |
Good idea, I will look into IPMI. |
18 |
|
19 |
>> Is a 100M uplink enough if this is my only system on the LAN? |
20 |
> gigabit NICs are pretty cheap i'd be surprised if any new machine didn't |
21 |
> have gigabit. i would suggest if you ever want to transfer data over |
22 |
> 10GB across the network you should request gigabit |
23 |
|
24 |
I should be OK with 100M. I shouldn't be copying anything across the LAN. |
25 |
|
26 |
>> Any opinions on Soft Layer? |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> - Grant |
29 |
> are you putting this server in colocation at softlayer? if so OOB is a |
30 |
> requirement, and gigabit is not |
31 |
|
32 |
I decided against colocation because I don't want to be responsible |
33 |
for fixing hardware problems. It would be a hosted machine. |
34 |
|
35 |
- Grant |