1 |
On 2013-07-05, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> I had a interesting adventure the other day. A friend of mine's son |
5 |
>> is getting ready to go to college. Budget is tight so we went to |
6 |
>> find a used laptop for him. I went into the local puter shop and the |
7 |
>> techie guy there had a interesting statement that makes me think I'm |
8 |
>> not recommending them for computer service to anyone else. While we |
9 |
>> was chatting, he said that Linux is just as prone to getting a virus |
10 |
>> as windoze and so is a Mac. I think my laughing let him know I |
11 |
>> wasn't buying his comment. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> I since did some googling and it seems I am right and he just thought |
14 |
>> I was some know nothing guy he could sell some service too. Anyway, |
15 |
>> has anything changed to make Linux more prone to viruses than it used |
16 |
>> to be? I read a percentage somewhere that said like 99% of viruses |
17 |
>> are windoze only. Is there a indisputable source of information on |
18 |
>> this? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> There have absolutely been viruses and various root exploits for |
21 |
> Linux systems, but to say it is even 1% as many as Windows would |
22 |
> probably be a massive overstatement. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Not that Linux or Mac are necessarily inherently more secure than |
25 |
> Windows, |
26 |
|
27 |
Well, I'm pretty sure that was the case for Linux for most of the past |
28 |
20 years. People who's opinions I trust tell me that Windows security |
29 |
has vastly improved in the past few years. Even so, a 90% reduction |
30 |
in security issues in Windows still leaves them at least a factor of |
31 |
10 worse that most all recent Linux distros that are installed and |
32 |
updated with even minimal competence. |
33 |
|
34 |
That said, even Linux has exploits. Once upon a time about 12 years |
35 |
ago, one of my Linux boxes got rooted. That machine was still using |
36 |
dial-up (no firewall). It had an external modem with tx/rx LEDs, and |
37 |
I always made sure the modem was sitting in plain site. |
38 |
|
39 |
One day I noticed the tx/rx LEDs start flashing when there shouldn't |
40 |
have been any network traffic. I disconnected the phone line, and |
41 |
after some investigation found a root-kit had been installed. I |
42 |
powered off the machine, signed up for DSL (which included a modem |
43 |
with a router/firewall), wiped the disk, and reinstalled the OS. |
44 |
|
45 |
Haven't had a problem since then... [Famous last words.] |
46 |
|
47 |
Never trust a modem/router/firewall without tx/rx LEDs. Of course |
48 |
these days there are so many devices on the network that are phoning |
49 |
home to check for firmware updates, get TV schedule info, check the |
50 |
weather, and report everything I do to the NSA that there's network |
51 |
traffic 24/7 regardless of what I'm doing. |
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Send your questions to |
55 |
at ``ASK ZIPPY'', Box 40474, |
56 |
gmail.com San Francisco, CA 94140, |
57 |
USA |