1 |
Neil Bothwick schreef: |
2 |
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:10:13 +0800, Linux Java wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> I wanna to know KDE and Gnome which is more popular. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Why? Use whatever suits you. |
7 |
> |
8 |
|
9 |
I hope that you all appreciate my extreme restraint in not posting to |
10 |
this thread until now, given how very much I dislike KDE. |
11 |
|
12 |
But for the record, just so that all you KDE-heads don't skew the |
13 |
results com*plete*ly: |
14 |
|
15 |
I always (from my first attempts at Linux some 3 years ago) preferred |
16 |
GNOME to KDE. Never liked Nautilus, though (it's tied for second on my |
17 |
list of "most hated file managers"), and since I've never been fond of |
18 |
desktop icons and all that cr... junk... I still found it too heavy. So I |
19 |
switched to Openbox 3 (with a GTK "backend"), and now I use fvwm-crystal |
20 |
(with a GTK "backend"). Gnome-light is (always) installed, but I don't |
21 |
use it as a desktop. |
22 |
|
23 |
I have only two KDE-specific applications that I would not do without |
24 |
(both compiled -kde and -arts to the greatest extent possible): Krusader |
25 |
(though this needs Konq and some other KDE utils for best usage, as it |
26 |
recognizes KDE apps much much better than GTK apps for viewing files and |
27 |
the like), and K3b. These apps require kdebase, so I've got that, but |
28 |
the day you see me logging into KDE, you can rest assured that either: |
29 |
|
30 |
1) my system is so seriously broke that it's the only DE/WM I can get |
31 |
into (which is pretty unlikely. I mean, I've got iceWM and *afterstep* |
32 |
on the system, for Pete's sake; the day that doesn't work but KDE does |
33 |
will be... "The" day); |
34 |
|
35 |
or |
36 |
|
37 |
2) I have been replaced by an alien clone (shoot first, ask questions |
38 |
later). |
39 |
|
40 |
I prefer to use GTK-based applications wherever possible because I find |
41 |
them more attractive in general, and I'm more used to them (as a GNOME |
42 |
user originally), unless they're junk, like Totem, in which case I use |
43 |
"non-affiliated" programs like Xine or mPlayer. Yes, I know Totem can be |
44 |
configured to use a Xine backend. Imo, there's no point; if that's the |
45 |
only way Totem works, I might as well just use Xine. Plus I want to see |
46 |
when gStreamer gets its act together. However I have no objection to |
47 |
QT-based apps (as opposed to KDE apps) when necessary. It does need to |
48 |
be "necessary", though (meaning, if I need it, I'll install qdvdauthor, |
49 |
because there's no GTK alternative that I know of, but I can just as |
50 |
well use the CLI original, unless the GUI version has some additional |
51 |
feature or makes it easier to understand than the CLI version's man page). |
52 |
|
53 |
So anyway, Neil is of course right: use what you want; it's *your* |
54 |
desktop (finally!). I don't need a whole lot of GUI features (in fact I |
55 |
dislike a whole lot of GUI features), so KDE is not for me, the one who |
56 |
never liked Windows(-like) desktops, even when I was using Windows; I |
57 |
used an alternative shell from my Win98 days on. But for those who feel |
58 |
more comfortable with a more Windows-like environment, and Windows-like |
59 |
assumptions about what a user wants/needs from their desktop, KDE may be |
60 |
just the thing; that is, after all, what it's designed to do to a great |
61 |
extent. |
62 |
|
63 |
You can have it, though. I'll be elsewhere. |
64 |
|
65 |
Holly |
66 |
|
67 |
|
68 |
-- |
69 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |