1 |
On Friday 02 February 2007, Harm Geerts wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 02 February 2007, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > I want to guarantee that foo-9999.ebuild in /usr/local/portage will |
5 |
> > be emerged in preference to an identically named and versioned |
6 |
> > ebuild in layman. How do I do that? |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > If I can't guarantee this, I'd also be happy bumping my ebuilds to |
9 |
> > foo-99999.ebuild, but I'd rather do it with a config option if |
10 |
> > possible. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> This is controlled by the order in which they apear in |
13 |
> PORTDIR_OVERLAY. The last overlay that matches a package takes |
14 |
> precedence. |
15 |
|
16 |
Thanks for this, but Bo beat you to the correct answer by 6 minutes :-) |
17 |
|
18 |
I think I'll make a suggestion to the appropriate maintainer to have |
19 |
this documented in man 5 make.conf |
20 |
|
21 |
alan |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Optimists say the glass is half full, |
27 |
Pessimists say the glass is half empty, |
28 |
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? |
29 |
|
30 |
Alan McKinnon |
31 |
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za |
32 |
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five |
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |