1 |
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:54 PM, walt <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 08/07/2012 11:46 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Each Windows VM has it's own Windows |
5 |
>> license as well as it's own virus protection license. I run different |
6 |
>> trading apps in different VMs. All trading VMs are Virtualbox. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Just curious if you've given wine a try in recent months. I use a few |
9 |
> proprietary Windows apps (but only for quotes, not trading) that didn't |
10 |
> run on wine at all two years ago and now they run very well. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The wine devs are very busy making improvements and they are clearly |
13 |
> very talented people. Remarkable project IMO. |
14 |
|
15 |
No, I haven't tried Wine in a long time. I don't doubt your remarks at |
16 |
all, the devs are great, smart, talented and dedicated people but I'd |
17 |
never trust 1 penny of real money to crappy Windows programs (which |
18 |
all the Windows trading platforms are) running in a Windows |
19 |
non-emulator when I can just run real Win 7 in a VM and not be |
20 |
bothered with any of that stuff. All my apps are 64-bit Win 7 versions |
21 |
now. They use lots of memory and tax compute power, etc. I've had apps |
22 |
running full out since 5AM PST today. If I was to choose Wine it's |
23 |
left to me to figure out if the apps even function, much less work |
24 |
correctly. I just don't have time for that. |
25 |
|
26 |
On the other hand the VM model is proven world wide in a huge number |
27 |
of application spaces. It's really stable, powerful and reasonably |
28 |
easy to use. It is the 'cloud'. |
29 |
|
30 |
As always just my opinion, but Wine is best for the casual Windows |
31 |
_application_ user, possibly lower end games or once in awhile |
32 |
Microsoft Word user for those who doesn't want to deal with a complete |
33 |
Windows install , etc. It's not, as best I know, a replacement for a |
34 |
critical work environment to run power apps in Windows. |
35 |
|
36 |
Opinionately yours, ;-) |
37 |
Mark |