1 |
On 25 October 2006 16:00, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: |
2 |
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 14:24 schrieb ext Uwe Thiem: |
3 |
> > I am compiling OOO 2.0.4 currently and am somehow surprised. Checking the |
4 |
> > ebuild shows that it still sets JOBS="1" but it *does* use distcc in my |
5 |
> > setup. At least parts of OOO are compiled on another box. It never did |
6 |
> > that before. Did I misread the ebuild? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> So how is using distcc and jobs=1 contrary? If you have configured portage |
9 |
> to use distcc and have distcc configured to only use the remote machine, no |
10 |
> matter how many jobs yoou start, they will end up on the remote (unless |
11 |
> distcc itself decides it's not worthwhile). |
12 |
|
13 |
I compiles OOO on both boxes in parallel. Actually, it just finished without |
14 |
error while I was typing this. And yes, the compile run was much faster than |
15 |
any other before. |
16 |
|
17 |
Uwe |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective. |
21 |
http://www.SysEx.com.na |
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |