Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which openoffice
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 19:55:18
Message-Id: 20080519195433.GB22684@nibiru.local
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which openoffice by Uwe Thiem
1 * Uwe Thiem <uwix@××××.na> wrote:
2 > On Monday 05 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
3 >
4 > > OOo has just got to be the most fscked-up ebuild I've ever seen.
5 >
6 > I think you are being unfair towards the gentoo developers. It isn't
7 > the ebuild but OOo's build system (and source). The gentoo devs just
8 > try to work around its extreme fragility.
9
10 ACK. Gentoo folks are not responsible for the OO-crap. Imagine,
11 these OO jerks even ship their own compiler+glibc.
12
13 Instead Gentoo folks deserve great honor for getting it built
14 anyway.
15
16
17 cu
18 --
19 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
20 Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
22 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
23 http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
24 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
25 http://patches.metux.de/
26 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
27 --
28 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list