| 1 |
On 2009-02-27, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>> Sounds like it's a 1.1 device to me. |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Yep, that's what it sounds like to me too. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Dale |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> But that's OK isn't it? I don't need 2.0 speeds between each webcam |
| 10 |
> and the controller, I just need the increased overall bandwidth of a |
| 11 |
> 2.0 controller so one of the 1.1 webcams doesn't use all of it. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The 2.0 controller doesn't _have_ increased bandwith if it's |
| 14 |
talking to 1.1 devices. In that case, the 2.0 controller is |
| 15 |
transferring data at the same speed as a 1.1 controller. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> I get the feeling I have a misconception somewhere along the |
| 18 |
> line here. Could someone straighten me out? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
A Corvette going 3MPH will get to the finish line at exactly |
| 21 |
the same time as a 4-year-old kid on a tricycle going 3MPH. It |
| 22 |
doesn't matter what the controller is capable of -- it matters |
| 23 |
what speed it's actually talking. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Grant |
Archives