| 1 |
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 21:02:02 -0600 |
| 2 |
»Q« <boxcars@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 21:22:23 -0500 |
| 5 |
> Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > It looks as if the change needs a 'news' msg. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If it turns out to be solved by the tools flag for kmod, I gotta |
| 10 |
> disagree. I also use -* , but I don't think we should get news items |
| 11 |
> whenever that's going to break something for us; we've effectively |
| 12 |
> waived that expectation. I do, however, very much appreciate you and |
| 13 |
> others posting heads-ups about possible breakage for us *- hardheads. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Also I'm sorry I didn't post a heads-up about setting this flag. I did |
| 16 |
notice it had to be done, but I didn't think it would bite anybody |
| 17 |
because virtual/modutils does depend on kmod[tools]. |
Archives