1 |
Hello, gentoo-users, |
2 |
|
3 |
I am thinking about doing the following: |
4 |
|
5 |
I want to use a WRAP-based embedded PC and run a GNAP-based Gentoo on |
6 |
it. This box should do nothing but be an iproute2-capable core router |
7 |
for about 10 (ethernet-)subnets. |
8 |
|
9 |
Currently a Pentium3-box does this job, along with services like bind, |
10 |
sendmail and squid ... it runs at one of my client's sites, and I want |
11 |
to split up things to detach routing from other services. No need to cut |
12 |
off several subnets just because one of the admins there reboots the |
13 |
machine for "making mail work again" (yes, education needed there, there |
14 |
is NO linux-knowledge there). |
15 |
|
16 |
My questions: |
17 |
|
18 |
Does it make sense to do my own GNAP-based OS, compiling current kernels |
19 |
etc.? The main goal is rock-solid stability, so maybe it would be nice |
20 |
to throw out some kernel-modules etc. Or use GNAP, as it is, out of |
21 |
portage, with the currently available GNAP-core? |
22 |
|
23 |
On the other hand this box won't get updated too often, as it should run |
24 |
24/7/365 ... What security-measures would be useful on a box like this? |
25 |
|
26 |
For the bandwidth-related questions: |
27 |
|
28 |
You might point out that this is too little bandwidth for connecting 10 |
29 |
subnets. This would be true if they were all 100MBit/s-LANs, but in fact |
30 |
most of them are coming in via WAN-connections of maximal 1 MBit/s. So I |
31 |
don't see much problem in this, especially as the current setup handles |
32 |
traffic sufficiently as well (at least it looks like ;-) ). |
33 |
|
34 |
Any pros and cons are welcome, as well as pointers to related information. |
35 |
|
36 |
Thanks, regards, Stefan. |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |