1 |
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 09:17:02PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 19:04:41 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > > I suppose that what I am about to say isn't really relevant, but it is |
5 |
> > > unfortunate over the past year that people blamed udev specifically |
6 |
> > > for this. It is true that it does things that don't work if /usr isn't |
7 |
> > > mounted, but eudev does as well, since it is basically the same code. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Who else is there to blame? We are continually being told that a |
10 |
> > separate /usr is "broken", as though this were some unfortunate act of |
11 |
> > <insert your deity here>, much like an earthquake. This gets |
12 |
> > patronising really quickly. (Please note, I'm NOT blaming you here. I |
13 |
> > appreciate that you're as much victim as Dale or me or anyone else |
14 |
> > round here.) |
15 |
> |
16 |
> It's evolution. Linux has for years been moving in this direction, now it |
17 |
> has reached the point where the Gentoo devs can no longer devote the |
18 |
> increasing time needed to support what has now become an dge case. |
19 |
|
20 |
Yeah and that's just vague crap without content ;) |
21 |
|
22 |
> > No, this breaking of separate /usr was done by some specific project, |
23 |
> > some specific person, even, in a supreme display of incompetence, |
24 |
> > malice, or arrogance. How come this project and this person have |
25 |
> > managed to maintain such a low profile? There seems to have been some |
26 |
> > sort of conspiracy to do this breakage in secret, each member of the |
27 |
> > coven pushing the plot until the damage was irrevocable. Who was it? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> So which was it, one specific person or a coven of conspirators? This is |
30 |
> open source, secret conspiracies don't really work well. If this really |
31 |
> was such a bad move, do you really think the likes of Greg K-H would not |
32 |
> have stepped in? Or is he a conspirator too? |
33 |
|
34 |
No he's just a bit naive: he wants to believe the best of people and did |
35 |
not realise quite how sneaky Poettering is. No doubt he still doesn't. But |
36 |
I'm sure he never foresaw some of their shenanighans, such as claiming their |
37 |
newly inserted breakage was the fault of device-drivers and everyone should |
38 |
switch to their funky new way of loading modules. No-one seemed to think |
39 |
what Torvalds said was incorrect, even if they disagreed with his tone. |
40 |
|
41 |
And yet that's exactly the same crap they pull in user-space, only they seem |
42 |
to think the kernel mentality of "userspace is crazy" is a howto methodology. |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |