1 |
On 02/24/2010 07:57 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
> On Mittwoch 24 Februar 2010, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
3 |
>> On 02/24/2010 07:08 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Mittwoch 24 Februar 2010, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
5 |
>>>> On 02/24/2010 06:43 PM, Mike Edenfield wrote: |
6 |
>>>>> On 2/24/2010 8:41 AM, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote: |
7 |
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 03:38:09PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
8 |
>>>>>>> On 02/24/2010 04:27 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: |
9 |
>>>>>>>> I've been using KDE for a long time, for reasons that are no longer |
10 |
>>>>>>>> important to me. I have remained out of pure inertia. |
11 |
>>>>>>>> I use gnome happily at work, both on Fedora and Ubuntu. All I need |
12 |
>>>>>>>> from any of them is a panel with some favorites, and a pager for |
13 |
>>>>>>>> multiple desktops. |
14 |
>>>>>>>> I spend most of my time in vim, in the C program and documentation |
15 |
>>>>>>>> toolchains or in a browser. |
16 |
>>>>>>>> |
17 |
>>>>>>>> The reason I bring this up is that my account just froze on me from |
18 |
>>>>>>>> running out of disk space. A little research showed that an |
19 |
>>>>>>>> odd-sounding thing called nepomuk was using 7.2 G (SEVEN GIGS) in |
20 |
>>>>>>>> some dotfiles. It turns out to be a KDE client - whatever that is. |
21 |
>>>>>>>> I've got a lot of space here and there, but my /home partition was |
22 |
>>>>>>>> never near full before. |
23 |
>>>>>>> |
24 |
>>>>>>> Put "-semantic-desktop" in your make.conf. emerge -auDN world. |
25 |
>>>>>>> emerge -a --depclean. That should do it. |
26 |
>>>>>> |
27 |
>>>>>> Is that even possible? Won't a number of KDE apps demand the |
28 |
>>>>>> semantic-desktop use flag set? |
29 |
>>>>> |
30 |
>>>>> For KDE 4.4, +semantic-desktop is mandatory, though you can still turn |
31 |
>>>>> off the services after installing them. |
32 |
>>>>> |
33 |
>>>>> Honestly, for what the OP appears to need out of a desktop environment, |
34 |
>>>>> he'd be more than happy with Xfce or something and save a ton of disk |
35 |
>>>>> space. |
36 |
>>>> |
37 |
>>>> How do you know what he needs? He probably wants KDE but without the |
38 |
>>>> whole "Semantic Desktop" thingy. |
39 |
>>> |
40 |
>>> he wrote: |
41 |
>>>> Thanks. My having research work with a few hundred thousand small files |
42 |
>>> |
43 |
>>> and a couple of terrabytes of storage and backups could account for the |
44 |
>>> size. Some occasional sluggishness too. It makes no sense to index any |
45 |
>>> of this, so ditching it feels good. |
46 |
>>> |
47 |
>>> and semantic-desktop was developed to help people with such workloads. |
48 |
>> |
49 |
>> I don't understand your reply or what it answers. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> because you haven't read the thread before you wrote your email? |
52 |
|
53 |
Yeah, I'm the one who suggested the OP needs semantic desktop even |
54 |
though he clearly stated he doesn't: |
55 |
|
56 |
"It makes no sense to index any of this, so ditching it feels good." |
57 |
|
58 |
Perhaps it's a language barrier. I'll state it in simpler words: The |
59 |
OP does not want to index any of his files. He wants to disable that |
60 |
functionality. He has not indicated that he wants to switch from KDE to |
61 |
something else. |
62 |
|
63 |
OK, another poster then showed up and suggested that he needs something |
64 |
other than KDE. That didn't make any sense since the OP is using KDE |
65 |
and just wants the indexing stuff gone, which is what I pointed out. |
66 |
Then you come along with the statement as a reply to it: |
67 |
|
68 |
"and semantic-desktop was developed to help people with such workloads." |
69 |
|
70 |
which doesn't make any sense with the flow of the discussion. Semantic |
71 |
desktop was invented for that, but the OP clearly stated he doesn't want it. |
72 |
|
73 |
I am not the one who doesn't read the thread before writing my email. |