1 |
On 10/25/06, PaulNM <gentoo@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Juan Miguel Perez wrote: |
3 |
> > try to unmerge the package and later compilit again |
4 |
> > emerge -C mplayer |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I'd advise against this. The problem is clearly with the download, so |
7 |
> why go without a perfectly good program for a while since there's |
8 |
> nothing the currently installed version could do to cause this. Either |
9 |
> the ebuild is screwed (wrong file size/digest/location), or the distfile |
10 |
> is wrong. |
11 |
> |
12 |
Well, actually my install of mplayer is currently screwed anyways |
13 |
since I already got rid of xmms, which mplayer was built against. (I |
14 |
really wish that if the dev's knew that xmms was dying that perhaps |
15 |
they would have strongly recommend against people using the xmms USE |
16 |
flags. Not being on the dev lists, I had no idea.) Perhaps I'll |
17 |
unmask xmms and temporarily install it again. |
18 |
|
19 |
> Am the only one who has been seeing this rather frequently lately. It |
20 |
> used to be that I'd never see anything like this a year ago. A couple |
21 |
> months ago was my first experience with this kind of issue, and now I'm |
22 |
> seeing it a few times a month to twice in one night. I do not redigest |
23 |
> due to the security concerns, so it's getting real annoying having to |
24 |
> "--skipfirst" on up to the three Gentoo machines I run, then wait 1 to 3 |
25 |
> days for things to get fixed. This is especially true when it's an |
26 |
> ebuild not installed on my headless server/local rsync mirror. In those |
27 |
> cases I have to rsync the mirror, then the "problem" system to see if |
28 |
> the issue has been resolved. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Most of these cases don't generate a thread in the newsgroup, and the |
31 |
> qt issue above is the first time I've found a bug filed about it. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> I don't want to sound like I'm ranting, but the issue seems to be |
34 |
> getting worse, and has security implications. At this point even I'm |
35 |
> tempted to just redigest as soon as I see this, especially if it's a new |
36 |
> install of the program that I want to try out. I know there are a whole |
37 |
> lot of people out there who either don't care about redigesting, or |
38 |
> worse, don't know it's a really bad idea. All it takes is one incident |
39 |
> where a distfile gets replaced and we end up with good number of owned |
40 |
> boxes out there. |
41 |
> |
42 |
This is the first that I've seen this in a while, and yes it is a pain |
43 |
and I agree about the security concerns. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Les Henderson |
47 |
ljhender@×××××.com |
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |