Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: tastytea <gentoo@××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What replaced python-updater?
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 06:54:35
Message-Id: 20201205075425.55072bcb@ventiloplattform.tastytea.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: What replaced python-updater? by Grant Edwards
1 On 2020-12-05 01:04-0000 Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>
2 wrote:
3
4 > On 2020-12-04, tastytea <gentoo@××××××××.de> wrote:
5 > > On 2020-12-04 17:39-0000 Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>
6 > > wrote:
7 > >> [...]
8 > >>
9 > >> I used to use 'python-updater' to take care of that, but it's
10 > >> gone. What are we supposed to use in its place?
11 > >>
12 > >> Are we just supposed to manually re-emerge various python modules
13 > >> over the next few weeks as we stumble across failures?
14 > >
15 > > emerge --changed-use --deep @world should take care of that.
16 >
17 > I always update with -ND (--newuse --deep) which I thought was
18 > supposed to include what would be built by --changed-use, but maybe
19 > I'm misunderstanding:
20
21 --newuse and --changed-use are almost the same. The only difference is,
22 as far as I know:
23
24 --changed-use, -U
25 […] Unlike --newuse, the --changed-use option does not trigger
26 reinstallation when flags that the user has not enabled are added or
27 removed.
28
29 I don't know why that didn't catch all python modules.