Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: thelma@×××××××××××.com
To: gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:15:02
Message-Id: ff4f3a70-a072-1445-db9d-3b09f56ea728@sys-concept.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase) by Peter Humphrey
1 On 03/28/2018 01:32 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
2 > On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 16:25:10 BST thelma@×××××××××××.com wrote:
3 >> SOLVED!
4 >> The gcc-6.4.0-r1 compiled with
5 >> MAKEOPTS="-j1"
6 >>
7 >> What is strange is that this is the second low profile system that
8 >> gcc-6.4.0-r1 failed to compile large package. My other boxed was 4-core
9 >> and 4GB of RAM and I had to switch to MAKEOPTS="-j1"
10 >>
11 >> The above system is: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz with 2GB of RAM
12 >> and "gcc-4.9.4" compiled "gcc-6.4.0-r1" with MAKEOPTS="-j5" OK
13 >> but when I switched/upgrade profile to "gcc-6.4.0-r1" it filed to
14 >> compile gcc-6.4.0 with MAKEOPTS="-j5"
15 >> I had lower MAKEOPTS to -j1
16 >>
17 >> So it seems to me the gcc-6.4.0-r1 much more resource hungry or there is
18 >> a bug in it.
19 >
20 > I have a similar system, but Atom N270. I wouldn't want to compile much on it,
21 > and certainly not GCC. I NFS-export its $PORTDIR to this much more powerful
22 > box, do the emerging here and then just install packages on the Atom. Still
23 > not exactly fast, but incomparably better.
24
25 I should have done it as well, it is a bit too late I have only
26 45-packages left to compile out of 710.
27 Is it better use NFS or distcc?
28 Do you have a good link how to do it with: "NFS-export $PORTDIR"
29
30 --
31 Thelma

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] gcc-6.4.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase) Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>