Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] possible gentoo-sources stuff-up
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 22:42:35
Message-Id: 200805150042.05687.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] possible gentoo-sources stuff-up by "Matthew R. Lee"
1 On Thursday 15 May 2008, Matthew R. Lee wrote:
2 > I just ran emerge --depclean and missed that it was going to remove
3 > gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2, the sources for the kernel I'm currently
4 > using. Now what I'm not sure about is, do I need the sources, or is
5 > the kernel image in /boot sufficient. Do I need to build myself a
6 > new working kernel before I reboot again? I can't reemerge 2.6.22-r2
7 > becuase it's no longer available. Thanks
8
9 Hi Matt,
10
11 The answer to why this happens is in a thread from earlier today when
12 this happened to mark Knecht. Summary:
13
14 This is a new thing that --depclean does. Just remerge the sources you
15 want, put them in world if you want to guarantee that --depclean won't
16 be overly helpful in future.
17
18 As for the sources themselves, they are only needed to build a kernel or
19 out-of-tree modules (ati drivers, ndiswrapper, vmware-modules, etc
20 etc). You already have a working kernel, so you are safe. Gentoo does
21 not require anything in /usr/src - unlike most binary distros it
22 doesn't keep kernel headers there, they are somewhere else and
23 completely unaffected by the presence or absence of full sources.
24
25 If you do need to remerge the original sources, you can grab the
26 original ebuild from the gentoo attic. Google will find it for you
27
28
29
30 --
31 Alan McKinnon
32 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
33
34 --
35 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] possible gentoo-sources stuff-up "Matthew R. Lee" <gentoo@××××××××××.org>