Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: fei huang <daniel.huangfei@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: wwong@××××××××××××××.edu
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rxvt-unicode has no transparency right after upgrade
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 05:56:40
Message-Id: AANLkTinWMtRcVzRujRLhdYgFCW7vbQurgQDXM9sn8HoV@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] rxvt-unicode has no transparency right after upgrade by Keith Dart
1 On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Keith Dart <keith@×××××××××.biz> wrote:
2
3 > === On Sat, 11/20, Willie Wong wrote: ===
4 > > If that were indeed the case (that they are forcing migration away
5 > > from pseudotransparency and into real transparency), then it'd have
6 > > been nice if the +/-tr tags throw some error text rather than just
7 > > being silently ignored.
8 >
9 > ===
10 >
11 > I did some experimenting. It seems the newest version has the
12 > copy-background-to-pixmap method overriding true transparency if that
13 > is set by the resources. That's the opposite of the way it used to be,
14 > but otherwise works. I just had to remove the other background
15 > settings, such as .inheritPixmap and .tintColor, and it works again.
16 >
17 > I'm afraid I do not quite understand how to make it work, removed all
18 transparency settings in Xresources already.
19 I review the source code and found nothing special, no
20 copy-background-to-pixmap method or the like.
21
22 thanks
23
24 >
25 > -- Keith Dart
26 >
27 > --
28 >
29 > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
30 > Keith Dart <keith@×××××××××.biz>
31 > public key: ID: 19017044
32 > <http://www.dartworks.biz/>
33 > =====================================================================
34 >
35 >