1 |
On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 16:19:36 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 15:33:02 BST Mick wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 10:19:23 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: |
4 |
> > > I'm using my ISP's SMTP server with the same settings as usual. KMail |
5 |
> > > detected them itself |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Yes, it does the same here, when I ask it to detect what Gmail wants to |
8 |
> > use, ... then it fails when it tries to set up a XOAUTH2 token via |
9 |
> > akonadi's plugin. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > I succeeded by selecting manually individual authentication settings and |
12 |
> > trying them one at a time. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Do you mind saying which authentication method worked? |
15 |
|
16 |
IMAP4 Connection Settings: |
17 |
|
18 |
Protocol: SSL/TLS |
19 |
Port: 993 |
20 |
Authentication: PLAIN |
21 |
|
22 |
SMTP Settings: |
23 |
|
24 |
Protocol: STARTTLS |
25 |
Port: 587 |
26 |
Authentication: PLAIN |
27 |
|
28 |
NOTES: |
29 |
1. Other combinations may have worked, but I stopped trying to figure out what |
30 |
works, as soon as I was able to authenticate with the server. |
31 |
2. Google has some setting you can access online to enable/disable what they |
32 |
call 'Less Secure App' authentication. They consider the good ol' |
33 |
authentication protocols and ports allowing IMAP4/POP3/SMTP to connect |
34 |
securely with a mail server and authenticate via username/password /less/ |
35 |
secure. |
36 |
|
37 |
https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6010255?hl=en |
38 |
|
39 |
Instead, they prefer we use OAUTH2 or some such pseudo-authentication |
40 |
mechanism, which works over HTTPS. Because browsers are more ... secure?! O_o |
41 |
|
42 |
Anyway, if you find authentication attempts are rejected by Gmail servers, try |
43 |
enabling "Less Secure App" authentication on your Google security settings. |
44 |
|
45 |
I've just seen these Gmail client settings, which you may find useful: |
46 |
|
47 |
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7104828 |
48 |
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7126229 |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Regards, |
52 |
|
53 |
Mick |