1 |
On 2 Mar 2010, at 15:51, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
2 |
> ... I'm happy with the new default arrangement: mainstream |
3 |
> packages under /usr/portage; layman overlays under /var/lib/layman; |
4 |
> and |
5 |
> my own variations under /usr/local/portage. Nice clean boundaries. |
6 |
|
7 |
Not that I really care, but I find this layout somewhat illogical. |
8 |
|
9 |
It makes perfect sense to me that /usr/local/portage should be the |
10 |
local version of /usr/portage |
11 |
|
12 |
But the different Unix directories are supposed to have different |
13 |
general purposes. I don't remember the details of that off the top of |
14 |
my head, but putting something in "/var" ought to indicate that it is |
15 |
somewhat different in nature &/or purpose to something in "/usr". The |
16 |
main Portage tree & a layman overlay are not so fundamentally |
17 |
different, IMO. |
18 |
|
19 |
Stroller. |