1 |
On 12/1/2011, at 10:47pm, Kaddeh wrote: |
2 |
> ... |
3 |
> First, addressing the SQL issue and why I think that that could be one of |
4 |
> the causes. The entire site, for the most part is all in one giant DB |
5 |
> (~9GB) a significant part of that is a 3gb table full of raw image data |
6 |
> (yes, I know that this is a REALLY bad idea to do, but I didn't design the |
7 |
> site, I just did a migration to off-site) that being said, there could be a |
8 |
> problem with that. |
9 |
|
10 |
I think I may have heard database guys argue for keeping image data in the DB. I'm not sure that it's always a bad idea. |
11 |
|
12 |
However: how much swap do you have? |
13 |
|
14 |
If you have a 12GB swap file, perhaps you will no longer see this problem? |
15 |
|
16 |
Stroller. |