1 |
> On Monday 18 December 2006 20:17, Grant wrote: |
2 |
> > I |
3 |
> > personally still love Gentoo. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> What's the problem then? :) |
6 |
|
7 |
Another question would be, how many of us have made healthy progress in our general knowledge of |
8 |
Linux all thanks to the gentoo user guides/howto(s) and the time spent installing gentoo on our |
9 |
servers? |
10 |
|
11 |
I really benefited from the "cookbook" approach that the user manual takes. It gently opened my |
12 |
eyes to many lower level processes that were always shielded from my eyes on many other distro's |
13 |
that I have used. For this reason Gentoo will always hold a special place in my heart. :o) |
14 |
|
15 |
However, I believe that gentoo's health is completely dependent on the number of talented |
16 |
developers that devote much of their personal time refining and debugging portage and it vast |
17 |
software tree. IMHO, if we would like to see Gentoo maintain healthy growth, more of us happy |
18 |
<less experienced> users should find ways to assisting the core developers by relieving them from |
19 |
the more mundane & redementry tasks. I am sure that the portage tree is already large enough that |
20 |
it is a daunting challenge for the limited number of developers to maintain it and keep it upto |
21 |
date with new software releases. |
22 |
|
23 |
Next time we see a call for assistance in the weekly news letter, we would do well to spend a few |
24 |
hours each week answering that call. |
25 |
|
26 |
Well that's my two cents anyway. |
27 |
|
28 |
Regards, |
29 |
|
30 |
Richard Broersma Jr. |
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |