Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Hari Purnama <hari@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] iptables question...
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:35:58
Message-Id: 4EECC48C.2030807@mapits.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] iptables question... by Tanstaafl
1 On 12/16/11 22:17, Tanstaafl wrote:
2 > Hi all,
3 >
4 > I was reading up on some iptables rules in the gentoo security handbook:
5 >
6 > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/security/security-handbook.xml?part=1&chap=12&style=printable
7 >
8 >
9 > It mentions DROPing packets with an INVALID state.
10 >
11 > It sounded/sounds like a good idea, so I added the following rule:
12 >
13 > -A INPUT -i eth0 -m state --state INVALID -j LOG
14 >
15 > As suggested, I addd this rule just ABOVE this one:
16 >
17 > -A INPUT -i eth0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
18 >
19 > I also changed the DROP action to LOG so I could see what it did if
20 > anything.
21 >
22 > Right after adding this rule, I started seeing lines like this in the
23 > log:
24 >
25 > Dec 16 10:15:31 myhost kernel: IN=eth0 OUT=
26 > MAC=00:e0:81:54:9c:8a:00:90:7f:86:a8:c0:08:00 SRC=208.87.137.233
27 > DST=192.168.1.252 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=52 ID=0 DF PROTO=TCP
28 > SPT=50113 DPT=25 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 RST URGP=0
29 >
30 > What I don't understand is why it isn't using my LOG prefix that is
31 > used for everything else:
32 >
33 > -A INPUT -j LOG --log-prefix "(>fw-drop): " --log-level 7
34 >
35 > Anyone?
36 >
37 Did you put the log-prefix rule before or after the LOG rule?
38 Or why didn't you put it in a 1liner, say:
39
40 -A INPUT -i eth0 -m state --state INVALID -j LOG --log-level 7
41 --log-prefix "(>fw-drop): " --log-ip-options --log-tcp-options
42
43
44 --
45 Regards,

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] iptables question... Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>