1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:46:34 +1000, Adam Carter wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> There's typically no need to use a VPN when accessing an HTTPS website, |
5 |
>> as the SSL/TLS already provides most of the privacy that a VPN would |
6 |
>> supply. The extra that the VPN gives you in this case is to hide which |
7 |
>> websites you're visiting. So the data is protected in both instances, |
8 |
>> but the VPN also hides the connection metadata. So if you use just |
9 |
>> SSL/TLS then your ISP can deduce which bank you have an account with. |
10 |
>> If you use the VPN as well, then cant even tell that. |
11 |
> Making a VPN useful in those oppressive regimes that require ISPs to log |
12 |
> all web metadata for all customers. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> There is another use for a VPN, to spoof your address to the site that |
15 |
> you are connecting to. For example, some BBC video services are only |
16 |
> available in UK (when I don't need them because I can watch it on TV) so |
17 |
> a VPN in the UK allows me to watch the stuff I have paid for when I am on |
18 |
> holiday. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Some of what Dale wants can be achieved to a greater or lesser extent |
21 |
> with Tor, so he should be looking at that too. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
All this is interesting reading, links included. I sort of had a idea |
26 |
on what a VPN did but wasn't real sure if it would really accomplish |
27 |
much for the hassle. If things like my bank don't support it, well, |
28 |
that's what I really would like to protect. The site I saw mention this |
29 |
doesn't concern me. It's just a video site. With my slow DSL, I like |
30 |
to download TV shows etc to watch locally. Doing it over the internet |
31 |
with my slow DSL doesn't work. Same with youtube. |
32 |
|
33 |
I have tried tor before and it seems to slow things down quite a lot, |
34 |
all the extra server hops I guess. Also, some sites track where a user |
35 |
logs in and if they all of a sudden login in from some foreign country |
36 |
or something, they flag it and don't let you in, which could be a good |
37 |
thing I guess. I had that happen with facebook and some other sites. I |
38 |
was just playing around with tor and it set off alarm bells on most all |
39 |
the regular sites I visit. I had security emails and such in my email |
40 |
box from just about all of them I went to. Good thing is, they did |
41 |
notice that something was not right about it. They know I use my |
42 |
desktop puter which is always in the same place. lol If I ever move, |
43 |
that could be fun. |
44 |
|
45 |
Reason for the post, curiosity for the most part but if it was easy to |
46 |
use and usable without a lot of hassle, I might would do it. I was also |
47 |
curious as to just how secure a Linux setup is as well. I figured it |
48 |
would be better than windoze for sure but still curious. |
49 |
|
50 |
Thanks to all. |
51 |
|
52 |
Dale |
53 |
|
54 |
:-) :-) |