1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> Looks like you have 200 processes sitting there blocking I/O. Is there |
3 |
> anything related in the logs? |
4 |
> |
5 |
Not sure - as I'm not sure where to look, or what to look for. |
6 |
> Your best bet is to examine emerge.log (better still - genlop) and find all |
7 |
> recent upgrades that might affect this. Then roll them back one by one till |
8 |
> the problem goes away. Once you know the errant package, we can start to |
9 |
> examine diffs and see why it might behave like that. |
10 |
> |
11 |
The only relevant package seems to be clamav... my emerge.log shows that |
12 |
I upgraded 8 packages yesterday just before 5pm - and the second of |
13 |
these was app-antivirus/clamav-0.95.2 - I think I simply chose to use |
14 |
the new configurations after issuing a dispatch-config... I didn't do |
15 |
anything 'adventurous'. |
16 |
|
17 |
Perhaps this might be something to do with a long-forgotten hack for |
18 |
clamassassin to work with clamd that might have been overwritten... |
19 |
(changing CLAMSCAN=/usr/bin/clamscan to CLAMSCAN=/usr/bin/clamdscan in |
20 |
/usr/bin/clamassassin) but this seems odd - since the date on |
21 |
clamassassin is 7 September 2008... and this problem with my server is |
22 |
very recent - it was working fine yesterday... and clamassassin hasn't |
23 |
been re-installed since everything worked fine - only clamav was emerged. |
24 |
|
25 |
As an interim hack, I've removed /usr/bin/clamassassin from my global |
26 |
procmailrc; stopped spamd; killed all the procmail and clamscan |
27 |
processes - and restarted postfix. This has left me with an operational |
28 |
server with which I can interact. It would seem very strange if I'm the |
29 |
only person having trouble with clamscan... in the context of what (I |
30 |
think) is a fairly standard postfix install. |