| 1 |
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 06:57:39 +0000 (UTC), Martin Vaeth wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Your whining in many postings becomes meanwhile unbearable. |
| 4 |
> Just face the facts: |
| 5 |
> Unless somebody comes up with an ingenious new idea there are |
| 6 |
> essentially only 3 possibilities: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> 1. One gives names in order of detection. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> 2. One binds the name to the card. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> 3. One binds the name to general attributes |
| 13 |
> (e.g. card type, slot type, ...) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> 4. One binds the name to the slot. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
While your argument is well reasoned and convincing, your arithmetic is |
| 18 |
somewhat suspect ;-) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I am in total control, but don't tell my wife. |
Archives