| 1 |
On 12/14/05, reader@×××××××.com <reader@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Robert Crawford <flacycads@×××.net> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > On Wednesday 14 December 2005 09:36, brettholcomb@×××××××××.net wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> Isn't /etc/package/provides the proper way to do this as inject is |
| 6 |
> >> deprecated? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > It's: |
| 9 |
> > /etc/portage/profile/package.provided |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Is it really /etc/portage/profile though? All my other `package' |
| 12 |
> files are at /etc/portage |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
>From "man portage": |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
/etc/portage/profile/ |
| 18 |
site-specific overrides of /etc/make.profile/ |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The read the file descriptions under /etc/make.profile/ |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> I just wondered if that is deprecated in favor of |
| 23 |
> /etc/portage/package.provided since all the other package adjustment |
| 24 |
> files are there and seem to work from there as expected. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Again, man portage. /etc/portage/package.provided will be ignored. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-Richard |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives