| 1 |
»Q« wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 06 May 2015 10:08:11 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> I'm using this version of bash, which I'm sure is the keyworded |
| 6 |
>> version. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> app-shells/bash-4.3_p33-r2 |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> I don't know of any issues so I guess it is OK but your system may be |
| 11 |
>> different too. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> This was mentioned in another reply but I'm putting the info here for |
| 14 |
>> you. This is the news item for this which could be the problem. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> root@fireball / # eselect news read 19 |
| 17 |
>> 2014-11-25-bash-completion-2_1-r90 |
| 18 |
>> Title bash-completion-2.1-r90 |
| 19 |
>> Author Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
| 20 |
>> Posted 2014-11-25 |
| 21 |
>> Revision 1 |
| 22 |
> I'm happy to retract my seconds-ago post saying I didn't think there |
| 23 |
> was a news item. Earlier today, I was chastising someone (mildly I |
| 24 |
> hope) in another venue for not reading all new posts in a thread before |
| 25 |
> jumping in, so I guess it was inevitable I would do the same damned |
| 26 |
> thing. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Thanks, Dale. :) |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Well, someone else here said they didn't see it either. Who knows. ;-) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Dale |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
:-) :-) |
Archives