1 |
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:16:27PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 12:34 on Monday 06 June 2011, Indi did opine |
3 |
> thusly: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:27:48AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
6 |
> > > Believe it or not you are supposed to "make invisible" all the junk the |
7 |
> > > app created. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Well, once you get some of the amazingly bone-headed defaults corrected |
10 |
> > tbird is pretty nice -- for people with eagle eyes who don't need an |
11 |
> > integrated addressbook function, which describes no-one I know.... |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > After much googling the conclusion is many many people are desperately |
14 |
> > unhappy about the fonts in tbrd and incredibly, it ain't fixable! |
15 |
> > Hard-coded font sizes -- isn't that, like, retardn00b mistake #4? |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > :) |
18 |
> |
19 |
> No, no, no! Surely you jest? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> tbird is a Moz product. Rendering stuff on screen is almost everything that |
22 |
> they do ... everything else supporting just that one thing |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
Yes, well isn't their cluelessness regarding defaults kind of legendary? |
26 |
I can't use firefox at all without pentadactyl installed. |
27 |
|
28 |
> > Another giant, glaring flaw: Doesn't appear to be any addressbook |
29 |
> > integration whatsoever that I can find, so it's necessary to pretend |
30 |
> > it's the 80s and remember the ancient practice of clunkily, manually |
31 |
> > C & P from the *separate* addressbook. Jeeeezus, and people think mutt |
32 |
> > is barebones, LOL (address autocompletion Just Works in mutt). |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > I've already got a whopper of an eyestrain headache just from |
35 |
> > testing it. |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > Tbird dismissed, not a realistic option. |
38 |
> > My users will bitch a blue streak over the lack of address autocomplete, |
39 |
> > god forbid they should have to type anything longer than "OMGLOL"... |
40 |
> |
41 |
> I kinda liked claws last time I tried it (earlier this year). Much like KMail |
42 |
> of old it just does mail and does it well. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> I found I couldn't use it though - I rely on the KDE addressbook a lot (it's |
45 |
> hooked into the GAL) and claws tended to get *really* upset everytime Exchange |
46 |
> pulled it's usual stunt of popping out for 20 minutes coffee breaks 4 times a |
47 |
> day. |
48 |
> |
49 |
> That's not claws' fault - I squarely blame Exchange for |
50 |
> |
51 |
> a) Advertising it does IMAP but doesn't really pay attention to standards |
52 |
> b) Saying the service is up when it isn't really |
53 |
> |
54 |
> KMail OTOH, just sits in the corner and quietly sulks when Exchange goes away; |
55 |
> then tries again in 15 minutes. Which suits me just fine. The requirement for |
56 |
> kdelibs doesn't bother me - this is a KDE machine |
57 |
> |
58 |
|
59 |
Thanks for that info, fortunately no exchange integration is required here. |
60 |
Claws is the next victim, in fact I've just emerged it. |
61 |
But now I need a break til the aspirin kicks in. |
62 |
Damn tbird... |
63 |
|
64 |
-- |
65 |
klaatu virada nicto |