| 1 |
On 29 January 2006 18:53, Michael Sullivan wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Keep in mind though that multiple emerges will share resources, so each |
| 4 |
> process may lose speed... |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
True, but "--fetchonly" emerge can pull in sources as fast as possible while |
| 7 |
the other emerge compiles stuff. That makes sense if you are paying through |
| 8 |
your nose for bandwidth. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Now I have got a related question: Imagine you have got one portage tree on |
| 11 |
one box but several boxes that NFS mount it with different world files. Will |
| 12 |
several parallel "emerge --fetchonly" processes on those different boxes |
| 13 |
still be safe? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Uwe |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Unix is sexy: |
| 19 |
who | grep -i blonde | date |
| 20 |
cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger |
| 21 |
mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount |
| 22 |
sleep |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives