Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Roy Wright <roy@××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] The Linux Ecosystem (with funny references to Gentoo vs Canonical)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:00:19
Message-Id: 4991F8EF.1080506@wright.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] The Linux Ecosystem (with funny references to Gentoo vs Canonical) by Mick
1 Mick wrote:
2 > On Tuesday 10 February 2009, Joshua D Doll wrote:
3 >> Saphirus Sage wrote:
4 >>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
5 >>>> http://video.linuxfoundation.org/video/1069
6 >>>>
7 >>>> I found it quite interesting that even Gentoo beat Canonical in the
8 >>>> amount of patches contributed upstream...
9 >>> Good find, I actually didn't know about E-Trade using Gentoo servers. I
10 >>> don't think it should be too surprising that Gentoo would contribute
11 >>> more patches than Conical, as until today, I'd only actually heard of
12 >>> one of them.
13 >> This video brought up an interesting question by my friend (an ubuntu
14 >> user). How would one go about getting Canonical or the ubuntu community
15 >> to change their practice of not contributing fixes back upstream?
16 >> Without having to change distributions.
17 >
18 > Gentoo involves you more with what goes bad under the bonnet and the average
19 > Gentoo user is more interested in the workings of their OS to attempt
20 > troubleshooting it and filing bugs. Your average Ubuntu user is less likely
21 > to get their hands dirty, unless they are a dev. So, essentially we are
22 > talking about different user profiles here. To answer your friend's
23 > hypothetical question - he would either have to change your average Ubuntu's
24 > user technical aptitude, or change the user. Either attempt may mean the end
25 > of Ubuntu as we know it.
26
27 The ubuntus are targeted at disgruntled windows users while gentoo is
28 targeted at unix users. The former are used to complaining and getting
29 no response while the later know it's their responsibility to help make
30 it better...
31
32 Have fun,
33 Roy

Replies