| 1 |
> It looks like they changed the naming between beta1 and beta2, but the |
| 2 |
> ebuild appears to take this into account. |
| 3 |
Sorry for saying thtat you are misreading the ebuilds. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I have just figured out how it works, but i think that is misleading: |
| 6 |
Unless you unmask the libkpgp package, emerge reports missing beta2 ebuild. I |
| 7 |
think that emerge instead of reporting that highest version of dep is |
| 8 |
missing, should report masked beta1 ebuild, because it matches the |
| 9 |
deprange(from 3.5_beta1 to 3.5.0_beta2). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Best Regards, |
| 13 |
Peper |
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives