| 1 |
On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Eric Martin wrote: |
| 2 |
> -------- Original Message -------- |
| 3 |
> Subject: Returned mail: User unknown |
| 4 |
> Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:39:13 -0700 (PDT) |
| 5 |
> Resent-From: cremes@×××.com |
| 6 |
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:39:13 -0700 (PDT) |
| 7 |
> From: postoffice@×××.com |
| 8 |
> To: Eric Martin <freak4uxxx@×××××.com> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The original message was received at 2008-04-16 12:35:26 -0500 |
| 11 |
> from postoffice.(null) [10.0.0.1] |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> ~ ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- |
| 14 |
> <cremes@×××.com> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> ~ -----Transcript of session follows ----- |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> ... while talking to postoffice.(null).: |
| 19 |
> |>> RCPT To:<cremes@×××.com> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> <<< 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: cremes@×××.com |
| 22 |
> 550 <cremes@×××.com>... User unknown |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Has anybody else who recently posted to the list gotten an email |
| 25 |
> bounce for a cremes@×××.com? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Nope but since it is an "unknown or illegal alias" rather than |
| 28 |
an "unknown user", I'd venture the guess it's a temporary |
| 29 |
configuration error. Before taking drastic measures like kicking him |
| 30 |
off the list, I'd advise to wait a day or two. They might get it |
| 31 |
fixed. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Uwe |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Informal Linux Group Namibia: |
| 37 |
http://www.linux.org.na/ |
| 38 |
SysEx (Pty) Ltd.: |
| 39 |
http://www.SysEx.com.na/ |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives