| 1 |
On Thursday 04 January 2007 01:49, Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> |
| 2 |
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] I want my xmms': |
| 3 |
> Incidentally, I just did a similar comparison on my machine between |
| 4 |
> audacious and amarok, and found that amarok consistently uses at least |
| 5 |
> 2.2 times the amount of memory that audacious does. And I've never |
| 6 |
> heard anyone call amarok a resource-hog. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
While I am a proud amaroK user, it does tend toward being resource-heavy |
| 9 |
and do-everything. [But, with my "monster" system, that's what I |
| 10 |
like. :)] |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
"If there's one thing we've established over the years, |
| 14 |
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest |
| 15 |
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability." |
| 16 |
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives