1 |
I have two local systems that need to be reliable and also have a |
2 |
large storage capacity. The thing is, the data storage doesn't need |
3 |
to be reliable, I just need the systems to keep running. The data on |
4 |
the systems is backed up and losing it wouldn't be the end of the |
5 |
world because of the backups. However, I really need each of the |
6 |
systems to keep running. |
7 |
|
8 |
I've read that an SSD drive should be much more reliable than an HD |
9 |
drive. What if I bought a low-price/low-capacity SSD drive for each |
10 |
of these systems, installed the system essentials on them, and used my |
11 |
existing high-capacity HD drives for data storage? Would each system |
12 |
keep running if the HDs died? If so, I think that would offer as good |
13 |
or better system reliability than RAID1. What do you think? |
14 |
|
15 |
- Grant |