| 1 |
On 12/30/2014 05:26 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12/30/2014 05:44:16 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hi all, |
| 4 |
>> Anyone out there using Paraview? A quick question before I put |
| 5 |
>> all of |
| 6 |
>> the "supporting doco", build/error logs etc, together. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> I'm attempting to get the latest version in portage, V4.2, |
| 9 |
>> built but |
| 10 |
>> I'm running into problems at the 45% stage, Linking |
| 11 |
>> libvtkRenderingOpenGL. Has anyone else come across any problems in |
| 12 |
>> this |
| 13 |
>> area? Any thoughts on how to fix the problem. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Hi, |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> it's the same here. It looks like a template error. |
| 19 |
> I'm using gcc 4.9.2 which is very strict w.r.t. the C++ standard. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I suggest, you create a bug report. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Helmut |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Will do. I also have Clang installed on this machine and set that to |
| 29 |
compile paraview. Unlike under gcc where it failed at trying to link |
| 30 |
libvtkRenderingOpenGL, it is now failing when trying to link |
| 31 |
libvtkRenderingVolume. The libvtkRenderingOpenGL problem appears to not |
| 32 |
exist under clang...... |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Andrew |
Archives