Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 01:20:53
Message-Id: 52268AE7.8070707@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo by Douglas J Hunley
1 Douglas J Hunley wrote:
2 >
3 > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org
4 > <mailto:tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>> wrote:
5 >
6 > Is there any reason that the creation, use and maintenance of the
7 > initramfs couldn't be as simple as a checkbox in the kernel
8 > config, so that running 'make' after the kernel was configured
9 > would automatically build it? Then, all I'd have to do is move it
10 > into /boot along with the new kernel (just like I do now), with
11 > *nothing* else required, and the kernel would call it, and things
12 > would just work (as long as it was there and I didn't forget to
13 > copy it to /boot).
14 >
15 >
16 > This exists. You can built initramfs right into the kernel. I've been
17 > doing it here for quite some time. You just tell the kernel either:
18 > * where to find a filespec so it knows what to include in the initramfs
19 > * what directory contains everything you want in the initramfs
20 >
21 > and then the kernel builds is and attaches it to itself during 'make'
22 >
23 > It's actually pretty trivial
24 >
25 >
26 > --
27 > Douglas J Hunley (doug.hunley@×××××.com <mailto:doug.hunley@×××××.com>)
28 > Twitter: @hunleyd Web:
29 > douglasjhunley.com <http://douglasjhunley.com>
30 > G+: http://goo.gl/sajR3
31
32 I tried that a while back. Followed a howto step by step, Gentoo one I
33 think, and it never worked, not even once. Trivial, not hardly.
34
35 Dale
36
37 :-) :-)
38
39 --
40 I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!