Archives
Archives
| From: | Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user <gentoo-user@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] What happened to Qt 5? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 27 May 2014 16:33:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAA2qdGWueaV5+Vu-ZvsYkyRRoJ645QNLfjqE8cQtPyWfrkiuTA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] What happened to Qt 5? by Nikos Chantziaras |
||
| 1 | On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > Wasn't it supposed to hit portage a long time ago? Any news? There's zero |
| 3 | > information on the http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/qt site. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I see many blockers in the "[TRACKER] Qt5 in portage" bug [0]. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I do believe the KDE project team monitors Qt5-in-tree closely [1]. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | [0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454132 |
| 13 | [1] http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:KDE/Frameworks |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Rgds, |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | FdS Pandu E Poluan |
| 19 | ~ IT Optimizer ~ |
| 20 | |
| 21 | • LOPSA Member #15248 |
| 22 | • Blog : http://pandu.poluan.info/blog/ |
| 23 | • Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan |